THE IMPACT /

Luma helped cancer patients report treatment side effects more easily and consistently, even when they were tired or unwell. By reducing the number of questions, adapting to patient input, and encouraging regular check-ins, Luma improved the quality and reliability of symptom data shared with clinicians. This led to clearer visibility into patient health and faster clinical response when it mattered most.

Simplified 80+ symptom question

Turned a PRO-CTCAE paper form with 80+ clinical questions into a patient-friendly digital experience.

Turned a PRO-CTCAE paper form with 80+ clinical questions into a patient-friendly digital experience.

Reduced reporting time by 90%

Reduced average reporting time from about 30 to 3 minutes using dynamic branching.

Reduced average reporting time from about 30 to 3 minutes using dynamic branching.

~20% increase in repeat use

Increased repeat use by ~20% through light gamification in the form of streaks and badges.

Increased repeat use by ~20% through light gamification in the form of streaks and badges.

Reduction in false negative reporting

Adaptive symptom flows helped reduce false negatives and improve reporting accuracy.

Adaptive symptom flows helped reduce false negatives and improve reporting accuracy.

THE CHALLENGE /

Cancer patients are often asked to report side effects using the PRO-CTCAE (Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events), usually a paper form with 80+ medical questions. When patients are tired or unwell, filling out long forms is difficult, leading to skipped or delayed symptom reporting. The challenge was to replace this heavy process with a simple and supportive way for patients to report symptoms while still giving doctors reliable clinical information.

RESEARCH INSIGHTS /

Long forms are overwhelming

Cancer patients often don’t have the energy to complete long paper questionnaires.

Cancer patients often don’t have the energy to complete long paper questionnaires.

More questions leads to drop-offs

High cognitive load leads to skipped or delayed symptom reporting.

High cognitive load leads to skipped or delayed symptom reporting.

Static forms lead to false negatives

Patients may miss or skip symptoms when forms are long and static.

Patients may miss or skip symptoms when forms are long and static.

Gamification drives repeat use

Encourages patients to check in more often and stay engaged.

Encourages patients to check in more often and stay engaged.

THE SOLUTION /

I designed Luma, a patient-centered symptom reporting experience that helps cancer patients log treatment side effects in a simple and supportive way. Symptom questions dynamically branch based on patient selections, ensuring key symptoms aren’t missed and reducing false negatives. Luma uses simple language, voice input, and light gamification to encourage regular reporting while delivering reliable, structured data to doctors.

Weekly Check-In

Luma helps patients complete a weekly check-in to report symptoms and overall well-being. The flow adapts based on their responses, making reporting quick and manageable.

Add Symptom

Patients can add symptoms anytime they occur and need not wait for the weekly check-in. This helps prevent missed symptoms and gives doctors more accurate, up-to-date information.

Add Reflection

Patients can share how they are feeling emotionally in their own words. This helps care teams better understand the patient’s mental well-being alongside physical symptoms.

Log Mood

Patients can quickly log how they are feeling using simple options. This helps track emotional well-being over time and gives care teams better context for patient care.

Tracker

Patients can view their symptoms, moods, and reflections over time in one place. This helps them spot patterns and supports better conversations with their care team.

Contact Care

Luma acts as a first point of contact for patients. It helps them understand when a symptom needs medical attention and guides them to reach their care team if the issue is serious.

WHAT I LEARNED /

Working with physicians at Mayo Clinic and learning from patients showed me how important collaboration is in healthcare design. Doctors helped define safety rules and what information they need, while patients shared how tired, stressed, or overwhelmed they often feel. This project taught me that good HealthTech design must balance clinical needs with human needs, and that small UX choices can make a real difference in patient care.

Mayo Clinic

Toxicity Reporting System

Reimagining cancer symptom reporting with Mayo Clinic physicians

Reimagining cancer symptom reporting with Mayo Clinic physicians

In collaboration with Mayo Clinic physicians, I designed a toxicity-reporting system that helps cancer patients share treatment side effects more honestly and with less effort.

In collaboration with Mayo Clinic physicians, I designed a toxicity-reporting system that helps cancer patients share treatment side effects more honestly and with less effort.

Company

Company

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Team

Team

2 Physicians, 1 Instructor, Me

2 Physicians, 1 Instructor, Me

2 Physicians, 1 Instructor

Role

Role

Product Designer

Product Designer

Timeline

Timeline

4 months

4 months

Impact

Reduced average symptom reporting time from 30 to 3 minutes

Reduced average symptom reporting time from 30 to 3 minutes